| ID: | 6304 |
| From: | Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:49:08 +1030 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] looking for alpha testers: sch-rnd hierarchic design |
| in-reply-to: | 6296 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
--00000000000073500f060f573949 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I am happy to test if you can provide an example hierarchical set up to look at. I have not had to think about designs beyond multisheet setups. I have some very simple layouts on the to do list with minimal component counts. Regards, Erich On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:44 , <rnd2@igor2.repo.hu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm making good progress with hierarchic design in sch-rnd. I think it > will be alpha-testable within a couple of days. Once I get there, the > project could use some alpha testing. We always have more resuidal bugs if > I'm the only one who test things, during development. > > > > If you are interested in hierarchic schematics and you are willing to do > early tests, please contact me. > > > > Notes: > > - hierarchic means a sheet explicitly refers to another; if you just want > to have multiple sheets, that doesn't need hierarchy (can be done in flat > multisheet already for a very long time) > > - this affects sch-rnd only at the moment, pcb-rnd's subc-in-subc is still > a long temr TODO, not covered by the current effort > > - the code has provisions for doing hierarchic exports long term, but at > the moment we always flatten the data for the abstract model and the > export is done from the abstract model; so if you are looking for > graphical spice frontend that supports spice-hierarchical, non-flattened > netlist, we are not yet there and current effort is not covering that (but > it may be possible long term) > > Best regards, > > Igor2 > > > > > > --00000000000073500f060f573949 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto">I am happy to test if you can provide an example hierarch= ical set up to look at. I have not had to think about designs beyond multis= heet setups. I have some very simple layouts on the to do list with minimal= component counts.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Regards,</d= iv><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Erich</div></div><br><div = class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, 18 Jan = 2024 23:44 , <<a href=3D"mailto:rnd2@igor2.repo.hu">rnd2@igor2.repo.hu</= a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 = 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br> <br> I'm making good progress with hierarchic design in sch-rnd. I think it = <br> will be alpha-testable within a couple of days. Once I get there, the <br> project could use some alpha testing. We always have more resuidal bugs if = <br> I'm the only one who test things, during development.<br> <br> <br> <br> If you are interested in hierarchic schematics and you are willing to do <b= r> early tests, please contact me.<br> <br> <br> <br> Notes: <br> <br> - hierarchic means a sheet explicitly refers to another; if you just want <= br> to have multiple sheets, that doesn't need hierarchy (can be done in fl= at <br> multisheet already for a very long time)<br> <br> - this affects sch-rnd only at the moment, pcb-rnd's subc-in-subc is st= ill <br> a long temr TODO, not covered by the current effort<br> <br> - the code has provisions for doing hierarchic exports long term, but at <b= r> the moment we always flatten the data for the abstract model and the <br> export is done from the abstract model; so if you are looking for <br> graphical spice frontend that supports spice-hierarchical, non-flattened <b= r> netlist, we are not yet there and current effort is not covering that (but = <br> it may be possible long term)<br> <br> Best regards,<br> <br> Igor2<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> </blockquote></div> --00000000000073500f060f573949--
Reply subtree:
6304 Re: [pcb-rnd] looking for alpha testers: sch-rnd hierarchic design from Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com>