| ID: | 5998 |
| From: | rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:04:52 +0100 (CET) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] Bug: extended objects are considered components for |
| in-reply-to: | 5997 from Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> |
| replies: | 5999 from Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> |
Hi Bdale, On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Bdale Garbee wrote: >rnd2@igor2.repo.hu writes: > >> At the end of the day a test case or a recipe for reproducing the problem >> is more valuable for me than a revision number where it broke. > >FWIW, I pretty much always get a pile of unresolveable DRC errors on >designs these days, too. They're usually spacing violations and usually >seem to have something to do with my polygon plane floods, but I haven't >made time to try and find a test case for you yet. Any time you want, >I'm happy to send you one or more live designs (since they're all open >hardware anyway) to look at, just let me know if that would be valuable. What would be real useful is this: take one of the DRC reports you consider a false positive; delete mostly everything else from the board, keep the two nets that cause the error. The smaller the test case the better. (Debugging on a huge, complex board, especially without understanding your board and intentions is not too efficient.) Best regards, Igor2
Reply subtree:
5998 Re: [pcb-rnd] Bug: extended objects are considered components for from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
5999 Re: [pcb-rnd] Bug: extended objects are considered components for from Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>