| ID: | 5896 |
| From: | Nicklas SB Karlsson <nk...@nksb.eu> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jan 2023 21:54:49 +0100 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] slightly offtopic: opencl, polylib, hw donation |
| in-reply-to: | 5852 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
| replies: | 5897 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
Have leftover: Nvidia P538 Unknown with text VPEARV71 on board and marked "Made in China" just as the other of course Asus HD6450-SL-2GD3-L However in doubt any of these are of interest for you. Also have a "Nvidia Quadro FX 3700". This is in use and useful for me but pcb-rnd is much more important so if you need it I will send it. Nicklas Karlsson fre 2022-09-23 klockan 09:24 +0200 skrev rnd2@igor2.repo.hu: > > > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote: > > > Den 2022-08-30 kl. 13:26, skrev rnd2@igor2.repo.hu: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I always have a long term plan for pcb-rnd and Ringdove. On this > > > long term > > > plan there's the polygon lib rewrite, which (unfortunately) needs > > > to wait > > > a bit, the queue is full with miniboxtk, librnd 4.0.0 and sch-rnd > > > 1.0.0 > > > preparations now. > > > > Mentioned it before. For polygons it may be worth take a look at > > https://doc.cgal.org/latest/Manual/packages.html#PartPolygons "2D > > Regularized > > Boolean Set-Operations" and "2D Boolean Operations on Nef > > Polygons". Or maybe > > https://doc.cgal.org/latest/Manual/packages.html#PartKernels "2D > > and 3D Linear > > Geometry Kernel" and "2D Circular Geometry Kernel". > > Thanks, but cgal is not a suitable candidate: it's not c89, it's C++. > > I can't use the docs either, because the goal of the poly lib rewrite > is > to have a lib that does exactly the same as the current one does. So > it's > not like I am going to rewrite it from scratch to use a different > algorithm. > > Please note: the original email you replied to was about one specific > request (hardware). I did a lot of research and there was some > mailing > about this earlier, and the conclusion of having to write our own > poly lib > is already reached. We don't need to go and spend more time on > rehashing > that part. Going forward, what we need is time (or funding; I am > working > on that part already) and for the opencl part hardware. Do you have > hardware matching the request in the original mail you could offer? > > Best regards, > > Igor2 > > > >
Reply subtree:
5896 Re: [pcb-rnd] slightly offtopic: opencl, polylib, hw donation from Nicklas SB Karlsson <nk...@nksb.eu>
5897 Re: [pcb-rnd] slightly offtopic: opencl, polylib, hw donation from rn...@igor2.repo.hu