| ID: | 58 |
| From: | Chris Smith <sp...@icloud.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 03 Sep 2016 15:35:42 +0100 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] pcb issues: grid |
| in-reply-to: | 57 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
| replies: | 59 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
Have I missed something? I thought pcb mainline switched to nanometres some t= ime ago, so why is it even using mils? Did pcb-rnd fork before this? If so, w= hy did you decide not to incorporate those changes? Regards, Chris Sent from my iPad > On 3 Sep 2016, at 13:34, gedau@igor2.repo.hu wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> I am doing a more extensive research on this, it's needed for io_lihata a= nyway (where I started off with %mr too, but I already see I will need to do= something else). >=20 > An intermediate result: with %mr, the best resolution we can achieve is 0.= 000127 mm - this means any non-mil value will potentially have an error of t= his magnitude. >=20 >=20
Reply subtree:
58 Re: [pcb-rnd] pcb issues: grid from Chris Smith <sp...@icloud.com>
59 Re: [pcb-rnd] pcb issues: grid from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
61 Re: [pcb-rnd] pcb issues: grid from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
62 Re: [pcb-rnd] pcb issues: grid from Chris Smith <sp...@icloud.com>
64 Re: [pcb-rnd] pcb issues: grid from ge...@igor2.repo.hu