| ID: | 5753 |
| From: | Robert Neal <in...@inspect.house> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:48:21 -0500 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change |
| in-reply-to: | 5740 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
C A D On 7/10/2022 11:06 PM, rnd2@igor2.repo.hu wrote: > Hi all, > > so it seems the consensus is that we want different file name ending than > the usual pcb/sch while I also want to keep it short (at most 3 characters > after the dot). I've collected all proposals that covered at least board > and schematics and matched these criteria. > > How to vote: > > There is only one syntax accepted for voting: list your 3 preferred > choices, like "C D A". It must be 3 different of the below list, ordered > by your preference (most preferred first). I will sum votes with weight > 13, 5, 2. > > Please do NOT write comments, explanations, etc, only the 3 letters. Any > vote not matching the syntax will be ignored. You can vote by replying to > this thread either to the mailing list or directly to me in private. At > the end I will publish anonymized results. The voting will be closed > after 72 hours (3 days) of this mail sent out. > > (Fine print: I picked weights to minimize ties, but if there's > still a tie on top, I will simply choose from them. I picked weigths so > that frist preference is overrepresented and 2nd and 3rd preference gives > only slight modification to help breaking ties. So it's basically: write > your preferred one first, then 2 others you can live with in case your > preferred one doesn't win.) > > > > Choices: > > A. rcb/rch; symbols could be rym, footprints rfp. So r + second char + > last char of the original, sort of replacing first char instead of > inserting one. So basically you type the same thing, just replace first > char with r. Except for the footprint where we insert r before fp. > > B. rpb/rsh; symbols could be rsm, footprints rfp. Same idea, but r + first > char + last char > > C. rp/rs; symbols could be ry, footprints rf. So two chars only, r for > ringdove, then one for the purpose. If it's non-natural, "unreadable" > anyway, why not make it also short? > > D. bor/sem for board/schematics, sbl/fpt for symbol and footprint (so > using totally different characters/terms only loosely connected - > guaranteed it won't match anything you ever used in this context) > > E. pbd/sms for Printed (circuit) BoarD and ScheMaticS, sbl/fpt for symbol > and footprint (first char, a middle char and last char, consistently) > > F. rly/rsc; rsy for symbols and rfo for footprints (ly stands for layout) > > G. rcb/rsc; rym for symbol, frp for footprint (proposed without > explanation; sounds a bit incosistent) > > > > TIA, > > Igor2 > >
Reply subtree:
5753 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from Robert Neal <in...@inspect.house>