| ID: | 5737 |
| From: | rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:23:40 +0200 (CEST) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal |
| in-reply-to: |
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, Hannu Vuolasaho wrote: >Hi > >I have also a wrong opinion. I hate stupid three letter suffixes which have no use. If some idiotic tool doesn't force to use I don't use. > >Most of the time I name my files project_part_(schematics|documentation|simulation|layout|notes)_version_$target > >So my proposal is that let it be .lht and let tool decide what to do. And if this is too bad for some automation, writing a small tool, let's say for example ringdove which can tell what file it is if it isn't otherwise known and even pass the parameters to proper tool Please read the original mail again: it can not be lht because of point 2, that's what triggered the whole thread in the first place.
Reply subtree:
5737 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from rn...@igor2.repo.hu