| ID: | 5735 |
| From: | Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jul 2022 10:20:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal |
| in-reply-to: | 5734 from John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com> |
Hi I have also a wrong opinion. I hate stupid three letter suffixes which have= no use. If some idiotic tool doesn't force to use I don't use. Most of the time I name my files project_part_(schematics|documentation|sim= ulation|layout|notes)_version_$target So my proposal is that let it be .lht and let tool decide what to do. And i= f this is too bad for some automation, writing a small tool, let's say for = example ringdove which can tell what file it is if it isn't otherwise known= and even pass the parameters to proper tool Vuokko ________________________________________ From: John Griessen <john@cibolo.com> Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2022 6:05 PM To: pcb-rnd@list.repo.hu Subject: Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal On 7/8/22 23:33, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > I wonder if we can find a > shorter variant, because my user preference is not to make file names > longer. layout schematic rly rsc rcb rsc -- John
Reply subtree:
5735 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com>