Mailing list archives : pcb-rnd

ID:5730
From:Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>
Date:Fri, 08 Jul 2022 21:59:03 -0400
Subject:Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal
in-reply-to:5727 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
replies: 5731 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
rnd2@igor2.repo.hu writes:
 
> In what situation would you name your initial file foo.pcb when running=20
> pcb-rnd instead of foo.lht knowing your Makefile expects foo.lht for=20
> lihata?
 
I wouldn't.
 
> Or are you trying to create a geda/pcb file using pcb-rnd?
 
Nope.=20
 
My issue is that I have a lot of existing .sch and .pcb files in my
design tree, where those suffixes currently have meaning relative to the
content.  While I could of course customize things any way I want, if
you change the default behavior of the ringdove suite tools to generate
.sch and .pcb files with lihata content, I'm confident I'll end up
dealing with files that have those extensions and lihata content one way
or another .. borrowing designs, trying to collaborate with others,
whatever.
 
I'm certainly not married to .lht as an extension for PCB designs .. the
total number of boards I've created in pcb-rnd to date would take me
only a few minutes to rename to match whatever your new default is,
updating my "harness logic" as needed to match.  I'd do that work
because I like using tools as close to their "default" behavior as
possible since a lot of what I work on is done in collaboration with
others and any time we customize at this sort of level, it's just making
more work in that context.
 
So .. what I hope for is that the default file name extensions for
ringdove are "unique" at least as far as avoiding conflict with any
existing tools that I, or others already in your user community, have built
infrastructure dependencies around, so that I can happily use the
ringdove default extensions for the designs I use ringdove tools for,
while keeping my big tree of existing design data around... and never
(as a human looking at files in directories) be confused about what is
what.=20
 
Bdale
 
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 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=PHvq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
 

Reply subtree:
5730 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>
  5731 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
    5732 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com>
    5733 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from Gabriel Paubert <pa...@iram.es>
      5734 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com>
        5735 Re: [pcb-rnd] file name policy change proposal from Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com>
    5740 [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change proposal) from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
      5741 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
      5742 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from Barath Aron <ba...@mailbox.org>
      5743 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from Gabriel Paubert <pa...@iram.es>
        5744 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change proposal) from Majenko Technologies <ma...@majenko.co.uk>
      5745 [pcb-rnd] Poll comments (was: poll on file naming) from Majenko Technologies <ma...@majenko.co.uk>
        5746 Re: [pcb-rnd] Poll comments (was: poll on file naming) from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
      5748 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change proposal) from ka...@aspodata.se
      5749 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change proposal) from Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com>
      5750 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from Wojciech Krutnik <wo...@gmail.com>
      5752 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com>
      5753 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from Robert Neal <in...@inspect.house>
      5756 Re: [pcb-rnd] poll on file naming (was: Re: file name policy change from Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>
      5757 [pcb-rnd] RESULT: poll on file naming from rn...@igor2.repo.hu