ID: | 5677 |
From: | John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 31 May 2022 08:29:05 -0600 |
Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention - conclusion |
in-reply-to: | 5669 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
On 5/20/22 02:39, rnd2@igor2.repo.hu wrote: > After this thread and feedback on IRC, I think there's no better > alternative so we are going to go with "design". Just saw this. Did you consider module, cell? Cell is nice and short...
Reply subtree:
5677 Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention - conclusion from John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com>