| ID: | 5672 |
| From: | Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2022 22:13:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention |
| in-reply-to: | 5670 from ka...@aspodata.se |
Also late but I have always thought designs, files, blobs or whatever you w= ant to call it as a database.=0A= =0A= I put, modify, link and export from there. As a name it is a really stupid = idea to call but maybe some related name.=0A= =0A= A collection perhaps. It's a subset of libraries with some relations. But = how to get that to some EE's brain...=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: karl@aspodata.se <karl@aspodata.se>=0A= Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 12:05 PM=0A= To: pcb-rnd@list.repo.hu=0A= Subject: Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention=0A= =0A= =0A= I'd propose "contruction", though a english speaker might view that=0A= word different than me.=0A= =0A= Did I learn a new word or did you meant construction?=0A= =0A= Best regards,=0A= Vuokko=0A= =0A=
Reply subtree:
5672 Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention from Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com>