ID: | 5670 |
From: | ka...@aspodata.se |
Date: | Fri, 20 May 2022 11:05:54 +0200 (CEST) |
Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention |
in-reply-to: | 5661 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
replies: | 5672 from Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com> |
Igor2: ... > While at it, I am not sure the word "design" is the best choice. ... Sorry to beeing late to the game. I'd propose "contruction", though a english speaker might view that word different than me. Regards, /Karl Hammar
Reply subtree:
5670 Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention from ka...@aspodata.se
5672 Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention from Hannu Vuolasaho <vu...@msn.com>