| ID: | 5669 |
| From: | rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2022 10:39:11 +0200 (CEST) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention - conclusion |
| in-reply-to: | 5661 from rn...@igor2.repo.hu |
| replies: | 5677 from John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com> |
On Wed, 18 May 2022, rnd2@igor2.repo.hu wrote: >Hi all, > >we have a concept that started from pcb-rnd but is part of librnd and >all ringdove apps by now. It's called "design". <snip> >While at it, I am not sure the word "design" is the best choice. After this thread and feedback on IRC, I think there's no better alternative so we are going to go with "design". Thanks for everyone who pondered! Best regards, Igor2
Reply subtree:
5669 Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention - conclusion from rn...@igor2.repo.hu
5677 Re: [pcb-rnd] RFC: "design" naming convention - conclusion from John Griessen <jo...@cibolo.com>