Mailing list archives : pcb-rnd

ID:4242
From:Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
Date:Sun, 5 Jul 2020 00:39:28 -0400
Subject:Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh
in-reply-to:4241 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
replies: 4243 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
<snip>
> (We did this as a cheat: we said we will always have a copper polygon around the padstacks).
 
Yes and my matlab was originally built to add that. Another miss step
on my part.
 
<snip>
> (We did this as a cheat: we said we will always have a copper polygon around the padstacks).
>
> Anyway, I am adding this to the TODO, for after the tinyopenems effort.
 
Ok. If since it's a missing feature I suggest another one. At the very
least there should be a warning in the log window that lets the user
know when the mesh lines don't land on the port. I have done a few
examples and I am doing more. Meshing with real life traces is harder
than the polygons of the scale in the filter I started with. I can
tell from testing that the active port causes no excitation if it
doesn't get all 3 lines.
 
Thanks,
Evan
 

Reply subtree:
4242 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
  4243 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
    4244 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
      4245 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from N <ni...@gmail.com>
        4249 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from ge...@igor2.repo.hu