ID: | 4242 |
From: | Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Jul 2020 00:39:28 -0400 |
Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh |
in-reply-to: | 4241 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
replies: | 4243 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
<snip> > (We did this as a cheat: we said we will always have a copper polygon around the padstacks). Yes and my matlab was originally built to add that. Another miss step on my part. <snip> > (We did this as a cheat: we said we will always have a copper polygon around the padstacks). > > Anyway, I am adding this to the TODO, for after the tinyopenems effort. Ok. If since it's a missing feature I suggest another one. At the very least there should be a warning in the log window that lets the user know when the mesh lines don't land on the port. I have done a few examples and I am doing more. Meshing with real life traces is harder than the polygons of the scale in the filter I started with. I can tell from testing that the active port causes no excitation if it doesn't get all 3 lines. Thanks, Evan
Reply subtree:
4242 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4243 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
4244 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4245 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from N <ni...@gmail.com>
4249 Re: [pcb-rnd] bugreport: mesh from ge...@igor2.repo.hu