ID: | 4209 |
From: | stefan <st...@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:38:33 +0200 |
Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator |
in-reply-to: | 4202 from Robin Laing <Me...@TelusPlanet.net> |
replies: | 4212 from Anthony Tuttle <ke...@gmail.com> |
<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br> </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:2e99427e-792d-6a1e-872f-9b898f37cbac@TelusPlanet.net">Hello, <br> <br> I am involved with a project that will involve high voltage pulse <br> circuit design and I am looking for a circuit simulator that will give <br> us an accurate representation of a circuit. <br> <br> Needs to work with spark gap technology as that is the present design. <br> Maybe gas discharge tube as well. <br> <br> Presently one member of the team is trying to use Multisim from NI but I <br> am wondering if there may be a better package. <br> <br> </blockquote> NGSPICE developers are doing a good job, <br> ngspice netlists may contain capacitors, resistors, inductors with arbitrary expressions about their value.<br> Moreover the 'B source' allows any type of voltage/current source with arbitrary expressions.<br> <br> Combining these elements a model for a gas discharge/breakdown can be created. <br> The big issue is not the simulator itself, but the quality of the model:<br> <br> 1) ability to accurately describe the device.<br> 2) simulator must converge to a solution.<br> <br> Breakdown devices (devices with infinite resistance that start conducting with very low resistance when a voltage threshold is reached) are famous for giving convergence issues. This usually happen due to poor model description. A current limit must be included in the equations (no physical device can sustain 1e15 Amp of current :-) ).<br> <br> Stefan<br> </body> </html>
Reply subtree:
4209 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from stefan <st...@gmail.com>
4212 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Anthony Tuttle <ke...@gmail.com>
4213 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Robin Laing <Me...@TelusPlanet.net>
4214 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from gene glick <ge...@optonline.net>
4215 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from stefan <st...@gmail.com>
4222 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator -- from N <ni...@gmail.com>
4216 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4217 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from gene glick <ge...@optonline.net>
4218 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4224 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator - openems from N <ni...@gmail.com>
4228 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Robin Laing <Me...@TelusPlanet.net>
4229 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4231 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Robin Laing <Me...@TelusPlanet.net>
4232 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4248 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Robin Laing <Me...@TelusPlanet.net>
4233 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from gene glick <ge...@optonline.net>
4247 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Robin Laing <Me...@TelusPlanet.net>
4219 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Gabriel Paubert <pa...@iram.es>
4220 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>
4223 Re: [pcb-rnd] Off topic (maybe) - Spice simulator - sparc model from N <ni...@gmail.com>