| ID: | 4198 |
| From: | Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:18:46 +0930 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] rf filter test data |
| in-reply-to: | 4197 from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com> |
| replies: | 4199 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
--000000000000bdaec305a891aeb8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Yeah, kicad only just got the ability to freely place vias in v5! You should see some if the hoops they were jumping through for stitching in the past. Some of the trace length stuff being in done in pcb-rnd currently might allow for some simple via fencing scripts. Regards, Erich. On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:06 Evan Foss, <evanfoss@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Fellow Pcb-RNDrs > > I asked this person who is doing simulator testing if they could share > their validation data and they did! > https://twitter.com/ElectronicsbyJH/status/1273114195987488769 > They also have tests of connector insertion loss. > https://twitter.com/ElectronicsbyJH/status/1271589349017243648 > > Also: is it just me or is kicad really behind UI wise? > https://www.reddit.com/r/TheAmpHour/comments/hazb79/rf_tools_for_kicad/ > > Evan > > > --000000000000bdaec305a891aeb8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto">Yeah, kicad only just got the ability to freely place via= s in v5!<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">You should see some i= f the hoops they were jumping through for stitching in the past.=C2=A0</div= ><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Some of the trace length stu= ff being in done in pcb-rnd currently might allow for some simple via fenci= ng scripts.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Regards,</di= v><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Erich.</div></div><br><div = class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sun, 21 Jun = 2020 15:06 Evan Foss, <<a href=3D"mailto:evanfoss@gmail.com">evanfoss@gm= ail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"= margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Fellow Pc= b-RNDrs<br> <br> I asked this person who is doing simulator testing if they could share<br> their validation data and they did!<br> <a href=3D"https://twitter.com/ElectronicsbyJH/status/1273114195987488769" = rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://twitter.com/Electro= nicsbyJH/status/1273114195987488769</a><br> They also have tests of connector insertion loss.<br> <a href=3D"https://twitter.com/ElectronicsbyJH/status/1271589349017243648" = rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://twitter.com/Electro= nicsbyJH/status/1271589349017243648</a><br> <br> Also: is it just me or is kicad really behind UI wise?<br> <a href=3D"https://www.reddit.com/r/TheAmpHour/comments/hazb79/rf_tools_for= _kicad/" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.reddit= .com/r/TheAmpHour/comments/hazb79/rf_tools_for_kicad/</a><br> <br> Evan<br> <br> <br> </blockquote></div> --000000000000bdaec305a891aeb8--
Reply subtree:
4198 Re: [pcb-rnd] rf filter test data from Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com>
4199 Re: [pcb-rnd] rf filter test data from ge...@igor2.repo.hu