| ID: | 384 |
| From: | ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jan 2017 07:16:24 +0100 (CET) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] self-contained executable |
| in-reply-to: | 383 from =?UTF-8?Q?Damian_Zar=C4=99ba?= <da...@gmail.com> |
| replies: | 385 from =?UTF-8?Q?Damian_Zar=C4=99ba?= <da...@gmail.com> , 386 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016, Damian Zar?ba wrote: >Sure,I will use for production on Windows. There're cshem or I must use >original gEDA gschem? Cschem is only a plan yet, so our main workflow is still gschem. > ATM I'm forced to use Windows 10 because of my Lenovo >laptop,which don't like any Linux distro,only VM works semi-fine :/ Ok, I've built current trunk for win32. The whole build process is rather manual and painful and undocumented, which will only change if we'll really have many windows users. You can get the pack at http://igor2.repo.hu/tmp/pcb-rnd-win32.zip after unpacking, cd tp pcb-rnd-win32 and run ./setup.bat then ./pcb-rnd.bat It's not a production-quality pack, just an experimental cross-compilation. I don't run windows so I can't try it, just hope it works. Please report all sort of bugs, and please expect that fixes will come slow: windows still has low prio, I can hardly imagine a typical windows user would choose pcb-rnd over kicad or eagle because of the strong CLI and scripting and Makefile support.
Reply subtree:
384 Re: [pcb-rnd] self-contained executable from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
385 Re: [pcb-rnd] self-contained executable from =?UTF-8?Q?Damian_Zar=C4=99ba?= <da...@gmail.com>
386 [pcb-rnd] new win32 pack (was: self-contained executable) from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
387 Re: [pcb-rnd] new win32 pack (was: self-contained executable) from Evan Foss <ev...@gmail.com>