| ID: | 3738 |
| From: | ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
| Date: | Sun, 2 Feb 2020 05:33:47 +0100 (CET) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] reversed missing layer export warning |
| in-reply-to: | 3734 from pc...@cuvoodoo.info |
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020, pcb-rnd@cuvoodoo.info wrote: >On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 03:51:23AM +0100, gedau@igor2.repo.hu wrote: >> I agree with this one; are you willing to contribute this as a series of >> svn commits? > >see patch attached Thanks; please proceed with the svn commits as we discussed on IRC! (Rationale: in pcb-rnd contributors get svn write access, so they don't really need to send patches via email) > >> So I'd rather keep warnings to drive users to set up their layer stacks >> properly, instead of keeping layer groups empty they don't really want. In >> this setup I think I'd have more okempty-group in the default CAM jobs but >> I would have okempty-content (or okempty) only in some very special >> cases, e.g. when we see specific fabs yelling at us when sending a >> through-hole design (with no stencil) without paste gerbers. > >I agree with your rationale. >I added okempty-group to all copper/silk/paste/mask layers in the patch. > >we did not mention them, but I would also add okempty-group to assy export, and fab. Sounds reasonable! TIA, Igor2
Reply subtree:
3738 Re: [pcb-rnd] reversed missing layer export warning from ge...@igor2.repo.hu