| ID: | 3548 |
| From: | ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Nov 2019 04:11:44 +0100 (CET) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] g-code export reconstruction |
| in-reply-to: | 3547 from Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> |
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Bdale Garbee wrote: >gedau@igor2.repo.hu writes: > >> However, if you do or plan to use g-code, please step up now. > >FWIW, I have no interest in milling/routing copper to fabricate boards, >per se, but I am interested in being able to generate g-code to use a >mill or router to separate individual board images from assembly panels. >I mention this in case it leads to any differences in your thinking >about the exporter. > Thanks! I had that in mind: using the CAM syntax you can easily limit the scope of g-code exporting to boundary layer groups only, or even to "routed boundary" (in case you combine routing with other type of cuts). In theory it's ready for your use case already. Be the first tester! TIA, Igor2
Reply subtree:
3548 Re: [pcb-rnd] g-code export reconstruction from ge...@igor2.repo.hu