| ID: | 3443 |
| From: | Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:40:56 +1030 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] non-graphical schematics, layout (was: Why focus on gtk?) |
--000000000000d3f9660594c2f07e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" What in your view does the PADS model have that cannot be done with any of the FOSS layout tools currently? Incidentally, pcb-rnd can handle netlists in multiple formats, including eeschema, eagle, gschem and protel autotrax, as well as tEDAx, and allows additional formats to be added fairly easily. Erich --000000000000d3f9660594c2f07e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto">What in your view does the PADS model have that cannot be= done with any of the FOSS layout tools currently?<div dir=3D"auto"><br></d= iv><div dir=3D"auto">Incidentally, pcb-rnd can handle netlists in multiple = formats, including eeschema, eagle, gschem and protel autotrax, as well as = tEDAx, and allows additional formats to be added fairly easily.</div><div d= ir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Erich</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></= div></div> --000000000000d3f9660594c2f07e--
Reply subtree:
3443 Re: [pcb-rnd] non-graphical schematics, layout (was: Why focus on gtk?) from Erich Heinzle <a1...@gmail.com>