| ID: | 3237 |
| From: | James Battat <jb...@wellesley.edu> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Aug 2019 23:52:41 -0400 |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] fungw: re-installation required |
| in-reply-to: | 3236 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
| replies: | 3239 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
OK -- verified the same output for c, lua, and tcl.
But have problems with perl and python:
=== perl ===
˜$ LNG=perl SCRIPT=hello.pl ./test_script
### Set up perl (hello.pl)
### Call hello()
ERROR: hello() not found.
res=-1
=== python ===
$ LNG=python SCRIPT=hello.py ./test_script
### Set up python (hello.py)
hello world from init 33
### Call hello()
Segmentation fault: 11
The perl output is the same as for languages that configure did not find
(e.g. python3). But that's strange since ./configure did find perl.
From config.log:
###report### Checking for perl... find_perl: trying to find perl...
<<<snip>>>
###report### OK ('', '-fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN
-mmacosx-version-min=10.12 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-fstack-protector-strong -I/usr/local/include -DPERL_USE_SAFE_PUTENV
-I/usr/local/Cellar/perl/5.30.0/lib/perl5/5.30.0/darwin-thread-multi-2level/CORE'
and '-mmacosx-version-min=10.12 -fstack-protector-strong
-L/usr/local/lib
-L/usr/local/Cellar/perl/5.30.0/lib/perl5/5.30.0/darwin-thread-multi-2level/CORE
-lperl -lpthread -ldl -lm -lutil\
-lc')
James
On 8/5/19 11:13 PM, gedau@igor2.repo.hu wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, James Battat wrote:
>
>> OK, make completed successfully, and I was able to run
>> trunk/example/test_script
>> Output is below (not sure what the expected output is).
>>
>> I'm guessing that all is well -- thanks for your help getting this worked out.
>>
>> All the best,
>> James
>>
>> $ LNG=fawk SCRIPT=hello.fawk ./test_script
>>
>> ### Set up fawk (hello.fawk)
>> hello world from init 33.000000
>>
>> ### Call hello()
>> Hello 12.000000 blobbs
>> atoi: 42.000000
>> res=66
> Looks good! Thanks for reporting the bugs and testing fungw on OSX!
>
> If you plan to use perl or python, running the test with the
> corresponding language and test script makes sense, just to make sure that
> language works as well. Should produce the same numbers on the output.
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2
>
>
>
Reply subtree:
3237 Re: [pcb-rnd] fungw: re-installation required from James Battat <jb...@wellesley.edu>
3239 Re: [pcb-rnd] fungw: re-installation required from ge...@igor2.repo.hu