| ID: | 3100 |
| From: | ka...@aspodata.se |
| Date: | Fri, 31 May 2019 10:57:55 +0200 (CEST) |
| Subject: | Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature |
| in-reply-to: | 3096 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
| replies: | 3108 from ge...@igor2.repo.hu |
Igor2: > a possible feature is "order the board". It would be a trivial next step ... > Question is wheter we want such a featurea, whether our users would use > it. I think it could be a selling point. Reacently I did a arm/can/test/labcard (#1) for a collegue. Local fab wanted about 500EUR for five cards, which my collegue thought was to expensive so he contacted some english website, which ended in that they wanted a kicad project or a surcharge... and in the end there wasn't anything ordered. #1 small.* in http://aspodata.se/git/openhw/boards_arm_aspo/stm32f105_can/ /// I think for the tree fabs in Sweden, this might not be needed because they solve whatever you throw at them. But if you like, I could talk with them and see whether they are interested. Regards, /Karl Hammar
Reply subtree:
3100 Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature from ka...@aspodata.se
3108 Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
3109 Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature from Gabriel Paubert <pa...@iram.es>
3110 Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature from Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se>
3111 Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature from ge...@igor2.repo.hu
3113 Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: place order feature from Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se>
3114 Peter, very last warning (was: bbvia, Re: [pcb-rnd] discussion: from ge...@igor2.repo.hu